
Prompt: review a month of content before scheduling it
Do not rewrite anything. The review that works is the one that points, not the one that replaces.
A review that catches repetition, unbacked promises and pieces with no purpose, before the whole thing goes into the queue.
Look at the pieces I have planned for next month and answer four questions, in this order: 1. Which subjects repeat less than two weeks apart? Name them and suggest which one to change or push back. 2. Which pieces make a promise the body does not keep? Quote the sentence. 3. Which pieces have no clear goal (reach, conversation, conversion)? List them without inventing one for them. 4. Where is the format mix out of balance against what usually works in my data? Do not rewrite anything. Point, with the reference of the piece, and end with the three changes that make the most difference. If there is not enough data for question 4, say so.

Redação Swonkie
Equipa editorial

